Dismissed

Machindra Maruti Repale and Ors. v. National Highways Authority of India through Project Directors and Ors.

Bombay HC21 Feb 2018WP/7291/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Three collegated writ petitions challenging land acquisition were withdrawn by the petitioners with liberty to make a representation before the competent authority. The court disposed of the petitions as withdrawn without examining merits.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw petitions with liberty to make a representation before the Competent Authority/Deputy Collector.

Machindra Maruti Repale and Ors. Vs National Highways… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

01 WP 7111.7290.7291.15.doc

¶2

¶3

P.H.Jayani

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 7111 OF 2015

¶6

Krushna Bapu Repale & Anr. ….Petitioners V/s. National Highways Authority of India & Ors. ….Respondents

¶7

WITH

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 7290 OF 2015

¶9

Janardhan Sahadu Repale (deceased) through legal heirs :- Asha Janardhan Repale & Ors. ….Petitioners Versus National Highways Authority of India & Ors. ….Respondents

¶10

WITH

¶11

WRIT PETITION NO. 7291 OF 2015

¶12

Machindra Maruti Repale & Ors. ….Petitioners Versus National Highways Authority of India & Ors. ….Respondents

¶13

Mr. V.J. Tadke i/b. M.B. Gawade for the petitioners. Mr. V.S. Gokhale – AGP 'B' Panel for the State.

¶14

Mr. Pushkal Mishra i/b. M.V. Kini & Co. for Respondent No.1.

¶15

CORAM : RANJIT MORE AND SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.

¶16

DATE : 21^st FEBRUARY, 2018

¶17

P.C. :

¶18

Mr. V.J. Tadke, having taken instructions from his client seeks

¶19

2 01 WP 7111.7290.7291.15.doc

¶20

P.H.Jayani

¶21

leave to withdraw the petitions with liberty to make a representation before the Respondent No.2 – The Competent Authority / Deputy Collector, Pune – 411001. Leave with liberty is granted. Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶22

It is expressly made clear that we have not gone into the merits of the matter and all points and contentions of the respective parties are kept open to be agitated before the lower court. Writ Petitions are disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to make a representation before the Respondent No.2 – The Competent Authority / Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition Officer No.13, Pune – 411001.

¶23

In the event the petitioners make such representation to the Respondent No.2 within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be decided as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of said representation.

¶24

(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.)

¶25

(RANJIT MORE, J.)

Machindra Maruti Repale and Ors. v. National Highways Authority of India through Project Directors and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Machindra Maruti Repale and Ors. v. National Highways Authority of India through Project Directors and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nice Shelter and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and 4 Ors. and Vikram Gokhale (Applicant)

Vasant Govind Kalokhe Vs State of Maharashtra through Its Secretary and Ors.

Parshura Ganpati Chavan Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Subhashchandra Banwarilal Kedia Vs Smt. Bhavana Chaggan Savla and Ors.

Krushna Bapu Repale and Anr. Vs National Highways Authority of India through Project Directors and Ors.

Janardhan Sahadu Repale and Anr. Vs National Highways Authority of India through Project Directors and Ors.