Baban Anna Namde and Ors. v. the State of Maharshtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
In absence of petitioners, application is disposed of as the amount is deposited with cheque in the hands of respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 WP 7123/11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
56 WRIT PETITION NO. 7123 OF 2011
BABAN ANNA NAMDE AND ORS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA AND ORS
...
Advocate for Petitioners : Nobody present
AGP for Respondents/State : Mr. M.M. Nerlikar
Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. S.S. Patunkar
...
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE AND
SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 23rd APRIL, 2018
PER COURT :
Nobody present for the petitioners. Reply is
filed by the acquiring body-respondent No.4 and the
Government. Reply filed by the acquiring body is
taken on record. It is informed that the final Award
is already passed and the amount is also deposited.
The copy of the Cheque of that amount is taken on
record. In view of this record and statements,
nothing survives in this petition.
2 WP 7123/11 2. In view of above, Writ Petition is disposed of.
Rule is discharged.
( SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J. ) ( T.V. NALAWADE, J. )
SRM/23/4/18
Baban Anna Namde and Ors
The State of Maharashtra and Ors
T.V. Nalawade
Sunil K. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court