A contempt petition was disposed of after the petitioner's counsel submitted that the impugned order had been complied with, rendering no further proceedings necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 473 OF 2016
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 6982 OF 2011
Babu s/o Deola Chavan.
Petitioner.
Versus
Ujwal Uke and another.
Respondents.
Mr. A.D. Pawar for the petitioner.
Mr. M.M. Nerlikar, A.G.P. for the State.
CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE & SUNIL K. KOTWAL,JJ.
Dated : 20th April, 2018.
PER COURT :-
. Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the order has been complied with. In view of his statement, nothing survives in the proceeding. Hence, the Petition is disposed of.
( SUNIL K. KOTWAL) ( T.V. NALAWADE) JUDGE JUDGE
vdd/
Babu
Ujwal Uke
T.V. NALAWADE
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
