The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking transfer of investigation regarding a case under Section 307 IPC, as it found it was not a fit case to exercise writ jurisdiction given that the charge-sheet had already been filed.
No relief granted. the writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(911) wp-692.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.692 OF 2017
Vitthal Bandu Patil : Petitioner. Versus Mr. S. N. Charaskar Police Sub Inspector, Kamothe Police Station, Navi Mumbai & ors. : Respondents.
None for the Petitioner. Mr. A D Kamkhedkar, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : R. M. SAVANT & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ. DATE : 20th JUNE 2018
P.C.
1 The above Writ Petition was listed on 13/06/2018 and was adjourned for today so as to enable the learned APP to take instructions. The learned APP informs us that the charge-sheet has already been filed in March 2017 and an offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code has also been added.
2 Since the above Writ Petition is for transfer of investigation, having regard to the aforesaid fact, we do not deem this a fit case to exercise our writ jurisdiction. The above Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed.
[REVATI MOHITE DERE, J] [R.M.SAVANT, J]
1 of 1
lgc
1 issue framed by the court
whether this court should exercise writ jurisdiction to transfer the investigation of the offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vitthal Bandu Patil
Mr. S. N. Charaskar
R. M. Savant
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court