Two criminal writ petitions sought withdrawal of the petitions which was allowed by the High Court.
Petitions allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp.3882.15 & wp.337.16.903 & 904.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3882 OF 2015
Anand Rao Babu Patil & Anr.
...Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
WITH CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 337 OF 2016
Murad Madadali Patel ...Petitioner
Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents
Mr. Umesh R. Mankapure for the Petitioners
Ms. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State
CORAM : R. M. SAVANT & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ. TUESDAY, 19th JUNE, 2018
P.C. :
1 The learned counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, seeks
withdrawal of the above Petitions.
2 The Petitions are accordingly allowed to be withdrawn and
dismissed as such.
1/2
SQ Pathan
wp.3882.15 & wp.337.16.903 & 904.doc
3 If any remedy under the Code of Criminal Procedure is availed
of by the Petitioners, needless to state that the same would be decided on its own merits and in accordance with law.
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
R. M. SAVANT, J.
2/2
SQ Pathan
Anand Rao Babu Patil & Anr.
Murad Madadali Patel
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
R. M. Savant
Revati Mohite Dere
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
