The petitioners failed to appear for the final hearing of the writ petition. The Court dismissed the petition and associated civil applications for default, noting the petitioners' apparent lack of interest in prosecuting the matter.
Petition dismissed in default and civil applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
206 wp 6752.04.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 6752 OF 2004
Shri Vasantrao Krushnaji Supekar and anr. Versus State of Maharashtra and ors.
....Petitioners
….Respondents
None for the petitioner. Mrs. M. P. Thakur, AGP for the State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & PRAKASH D. NAIK, J J.
DATE : 2nd FEBRUARY, 2018.
P. C. :
None appeared on behalf of the petitioners when the matter was called out for final hearing. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed in default.
[PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
Shubhada S Kadam 1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed in the absence of the petitioners at the final hearing.
Vasantrao Krushnaji Supekar
State of Maharashtra
RANJIT MORE
PRAKASH D. NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
