The single bench dismissed the writ petition in default as the petitioner had not appeared at the final hearing and was deemed uninterested in prosecuting the matter. Consequently, an associated civil application was also disposed of.
Writ petition dismissed in default; associated Civil Application No. 323 of 2013 disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
209 wp 1217.05.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1217 OF 2005
Mr. Natvar T. Patel and ors. Versus The State of Maharashtra and ors.
..Petitioners
..Respondents
None for the petitioners. Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP for the State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & PRAKASH D. NAIK, J J. DATE : 2nd FEBRUARY, 2018.
P. C. :
None appeared on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was called out for final hearing. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed in default.
[PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
Shubhada S Kadam 1/1
Mr. Natvar T. Patel and ors.
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
Ranjit More
Prakash D. Naik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
