This one-line order observed that elections were already held, rendering the writ petition infructuous. The petitioner was advised to file an election petition. The petition was disposed of without merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DDR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 6639 OF 2017
Vijay Hari Wagh ...Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents
Ms. Vrushali Penkar I/b. Mr. Bhushan Walimbe for the petitioner. Mr. S.D. Rayrikar, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : M.S.KARNIK, J.
DATE : 3rd DECEMBER, 2018.
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that as
the elections are already held on 11th July, 2017, the present Petition is rendered infructuous.
remedy of filing an Election Petition as the elections are now over.
of appropriate remedy the present Petition is disposed of.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.)
1/1
Vijay Hari Wagh
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
M. S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
