Allowed

Akbar Ismail Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra through the Dy. Collector (Acquisition No. 2) Nashik and Ors.

Bombay HC29 Nov 2018CAW/1566/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay recalled two conditional orders dismissing a writ petition for non-removal of office objections. The petition was restored to file, and applications regarding dismissal and restoration were disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Conditional orders dated 18/06/2018 and 23/07/2018 recalled. Writ Petition restored to file. Office objections dispensed with.

Akbar Ismail Shaikh Vs State of Maharashtra through… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

caw 1566.18.doc

¶2

Urmila Ingale

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1724 OF 2018 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1566 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9527 OF 2018

¶6

ALONG WITH

¶7

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1566 OF 2018 IN

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO. 9527 OF 2018

¶9

Akbar Ismail Shaikh .. Applicant/Petitioner Vs.

¶10

State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents

¶11

Mr.Harshad M. Inamdar, for the Applicant/ Petitioner. Ms.Nisha Mehra, AGP for State.

¶12

CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, CHIEF JUSTICE & M.S.KARNIK, J.

¶13

DATE : 29^th NOVEMBER, 2018

¶14

P.C. :

¶15

. By order dated 18/06/2018, this Court (Coram :

¶16

K.K.Tated & Dr.Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, JJ.) directed the Applicant to remove all office objections on or before

¶17

1/3

¶18

caw 1566.18.doc

¶19

30/06/2018, failing which the Writ Petition was to stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. It appears that the objections as directed by this Court could not be removed within the time granted by this Court. As a result of the conditional order, the Petition stood dismissed. The Applicant therefore filed Civil Application No. 1566 of 2018 for recalling the conditional order dated 18/06/2018 passed by this Court.

¶20

Civil Application No.1566 of 2018 was listed before this Court on 23/07/2018. Vide order dated 23/07/2018, this Court granted further time upto 01/08/2018 for removal of all office objections failing which the Writ Petition was to stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. It seems that the Applicant could not remove office objections even within the extended time granted by this Court.

¶21

Learned Counsel for the Applicant pointed out that

¶22

the only objection taken by the office was to provide legible copy of page No.15. For the reasons mentioned in the Application, it

¶23

2/3

¶24

caw 1566.18.doc

¶25

is necessary & in the interest of justice to recall the conditional order dated 18/06/2018 and also the conditional order dated 23/07/2018 passed by this Court. Consequently, Writ Petition Stamp No. 10272 of 2018 stands restored to file.

¶26

Civil Application No. 1566 of 2018 and Civil Application No. 1724 of 2018 stand disposed of as allowed. Office objections stand dispensed with.

¶27

(M.S.KARNIK, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶28

3/3

Akbar Ismail Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra through the Dy. Collector (Acquisition No. 2) Nashik and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akbar Ismail Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra through the Dy. Collector (Acquisition No. 2) Nashik and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Anil Nivrutti Dhikle Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. the Principal Secretary and Ors.

Shri. Sarjerao Babaso Patil (Since Decd.) through Lrs. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Shri. Sarjerao Babaso Patil (Since Decd.) through Lrs. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Akbar Ismail Shaikh Vs State of Maharashtra through the Dy. Collector (Acquisition No. 2) Nashik and Ors.

Mr. Shivaji Baburao Bhosale and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Govt. Pleader and Ors.

Mr. Shivaji Baburao Bhosale and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Govt. Pleader and Ors.