Hon'ble Division Bench disposed of three connected writ petitions (Nos. 6590, 6591, 6602 of 2018) by applying the principles laid down in WP No. 2358 of 2013 (Kiran Namdeo Shinde case).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6590 OF 2018
Deepak Baliram Bagul and Others
...Petitioners
vs.
State of Maharashtra and Others
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO.6591 OF 2018
Gangaram Harishchandra Patil and Others ...Petitioners vs. State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.6602 OF 2018
Rakesh Rajaram Gaikwad and Others ...Petitioners vs.
State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents
Mr. Saurabh Oka, for the Petitioners
Mr. Sandeep Babar, AGP for Respondents-State.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR &
N. W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE : JULY 03, 2018
P.C.:
. Parties through their counsel.
learned counsel for the parties, as agreed by the learned counsel for the parties, we dispose of all the Petitions in terms of the law
1/2
Vishal Parekar
laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Kiran
Namdeo Shinde and Others vs. The State of Maharashtra
passed in Writ Petition No. 2358 of 2013 and other connected
Petitions dated 21st September, 2013. The said order shall apply
to these matters also.
(N.W. SAMBRE, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
2/2
Vishal Parekar
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kiran Namdeo Shinde and Others vs. The State of MaharashtraApplied¶27
Kiran Namdeo Shinde and Others vs. The State of Maharashtra, WP No. 2358 of 2013
Deepak Baliram Bagul and Others
Gangaram Harishchandra Patil and Others
Rakesh Rajaram Gaikwad and Others
State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
N. W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
