Madrassa Arabia Rizvia Gousiya Masjid v. State of Maharashtra through Public Prosecutor and 5 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
SAS IN
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 59) chsw-165-18.doc
SAS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.165 OF 2018 IN
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.707 OF 2018
Madrassa Arabia Rizvia Gousiya Masjid V/s.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Petitioner.
..Respondents.
Mr.Sachin Dhakephalkar for the applicant-petitioner. Mr.Navdeep Vora I/b. Navdeep Vora & Associate for respondent No.5.
Mr.A.R. Mishra for respondent No.6.
CORAM: SHANTANU KEMKAR NITIN W.SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE : JULY 3, 2018
P.C.:-
Heard the learned counsel for the parties on the Chamber Summons. On due consideration, the Chamber Summons
by which amendment of the petition is sought is allowed. Amendment to be carried out within two weeks.
accordingly.
( NITIN W.SAMBRE, J. ) ( SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
Madrassa Arabia Rizvia Gousiya Masjid
State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court