Disposed

Vandana Khaduji Vaje v. the State of Maharashtra , through Its Secretary and Ors.

Bombay HC20 Aug 2018WP/6581/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition was disposed of by a direction to the Respondent No.2 to consider a proposal for granting approval to the Petitioner for a post and communicate the decision within eight weeks. Status-quo was maintained during this period.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent to consider the proposal, decide, and communicate the decision within eight weeks.

Vandana Khaduji Vaje Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

(25) wp-6581.18.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.6581 OF 2018

¶4

Vandana Khaduji Vaje : Petitioner. Versus The State of Maharashtra Through its Secretary School Education Department Mantralaya, Mumbai and ors. : Respondents.

¶5

Mr.Sugandh Deshmukh i/by Mr. Rajaram Deshmukh for the Petitioner. Mrs. Neha Bhide, “B” Panel Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

¶6

CORAM : R. M. SAVANT & K. K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 20^th AUGUST 2018

¶7

P.C.

¶8

1 The only relief sought in the above Writ Petition is a direction to the Respondent No.2 to consider the proposal dated 21/03/2014 submitted by the Management Institute for granting approval to the Petitioner for the post in question.

¶9

2 Having regard to the nature of the relief sought, we deem it appropriate to direct the Respondent No.2 to consider the proposal dated 21/03/2014 submitted by the Management Institute, take a decision thereon and communicate such decision to the Petitioner within eight weeks from date.

¶10

3 In so far as entitlement of the Petitioner is concerned, we express no opinion in that regard, needless to state that the said proposal would be

¶11

lgc 1 of 2

¶12

(25) wp-6581.18.doc

¶13

considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.

¶14

4 For a period of eight weeks from date, status-quo in so far as the

¶15

Petitioner is concerned, would be maintained.

¶16

5 With the directions as aforesaid, the above Writ Petition is

¶17

disposed of.

¶18

[K. K. SONAWANE, J]

¶19

[R.M.SAVANT, J]

¶20

Laxmikant Gopal Chandan

¶21

Digitally signed by Laxmikant Gopal Chandan Date: 2018.08.21 17:54:17 +0530

¶22

2 of 2

¶23

lgc

Vandana Khaduji Vaje v. the State of Maharashtra , through Its Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vandana Khaduji Vaje v. the State of Maharashtra , through Its Secretary and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Mohan Dasharath Naik Vs City and Industrial Development Corporation Maharashtra Ltd. and Ors.

Sachin Textile Vs the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.

Shri. Shivaji Raosaheb Naiknaware Vs the Municipal Council of Barshi, through Chief Officer and Ors.