The petition was disposed of as withdrawn. The Court observed that it did not consider the matter on merits and all contentions were kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
917-WPL593-18.DOC
Arun
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 593 OF 2018
Bharat B Thakur …Petitioner
Versus
The Dy Commissioner of Police (HQ-I) & Anr…Respondents
Ms Deepa P, i/b Veena Thadhani, for the Petitioner.
Mr Abhay Patki, AGP, for the Respondents.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 22nd February 2018
PC:-
1.The Principal Secretary, Home (Appeals and Security) is
requested, subject to other commitments, and if possible, to take up
the Petitioner’s Appeal against the impugned order dated 18th
January 2018 at the earliest possible opportunity. Liberty to the
Petitioner to apply to the Principal Secretary Home (Appeals and
Security) for an extension of the stay, if any, of the impugned order.
All submissions should be considered on their own merits. I have
not considered the matter to the merits of this Petition at all and all
contentions are specifically kept open.
2.The Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with these
observations.
(G. S. PATEL, J)
Page 1 of 1
22nd February 2018
Bharat B Thakur
The Dy Commissioner of Police (HQ-I) & Anr
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court