Bal Asha Trust v. Johnathan Andrew Pulos and Candice Cah Wei Pulos (Prop. Adopters)
Bombay HCJO/26/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
901-FAP9-18.DOC
¶2
Shephali
¶3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION FOREIGN ADOPTION PETITION NO. 9 OF 2018
¶4
WITH
¶5
JUDGE’S ORDER NO. 26 OF 2018
¶6
Bal Asha Trust…Petitioner
Versus
Johnathan Andrew Pulos & Candice Cah Wei…Proposed
PulosAdoptive Parents
¶7
Mr Rakesh Kapoor, for the Petitioner.
Mr O Hareendran, Scrutiny Officer, ICSW, is present.
¶8
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:21st February 2018
¶9
PC:-
¶10
1.The adoptive parents, Johnathan Andrew Pulos and Candice
Cah Wei Pulos are from America. On the last occasion I had the
minor referred to an audiologist. Mr Kapoor now gives me an
updated audiology report from Nanavati Hospital as also an email
from Ms Geeti Char, audiologist, to Mr Sunil Arora. Ms Char has
recommended certain further testing and also a change in the
hearing aids, further evaluations for an implant and enrolment at an
appropriate school.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Bal Asha Trust
- respondent
Johnathan Andrew Pulos
- respondent
Candice Cah Wei Pulos
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court