This court transferred the writ petition to the Original Side observing that the entire cause of action arose in Mumbai.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-6421.18.sxw
pmw
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6421 OF 2018
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. Ram Upadhyay i/by Law Competere Consultus for the Petitioner. Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1, 5, 6 and 8. Mr. Pradeep M. Patil for the Respondent Nos.7 and 9.
CORAM : A.S. OKA &
RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 15th JUNE, 2018
P.C.
. Not on board. Taken on board.
1 As the entire cause of action for filing this petition seeking a writ of mandamus has arisen in Mumbai, we transfer the petition to the Original Side. Advocate for the petitioner to carry out consequential amendment within a period of two weeks from today.
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J) (A.S. OKA, J)
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to transfer this writ petition to the Original Side as the cause of action arose in Mumbai.
Petitioner
Respondent Nos.1, 5, 6 and 8
Respondent Nos.7 and 9
A.S. OKA
RIYAZ I. CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
