This writ petition was disposed of summarily because the court, in view of a related order in Writ Petition No. 6284 of 2018, decided that no further entertainment was necessary at that stage.
The petition need not be entertained at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
509-WP-5144-2018.DOC
Jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5144 OF 2018
Smt. Kamal Laxman Borole … Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. … Respondents
Mr. Abhijit B. Kadam, for the Petitioner.
Mr. A.A. Garge, i/b Mr. Kashyap Bhalerao, for the Respondent Nos. 5 & 6.
Mr. A.S. Rao, for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3. Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for Respondent No.1.
CORAM: A.S. OKA AND RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATE: 14TH JUNE, 2018.
PC:-
2018, this Petition need not be entertained at this stage and
accordingly the same is disposed of.
( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. ) ( A.S. OKA, J )
1/1
Smt. Kamal Laxman Borole
The State of Maharashtra
Riyaz I. Chagla
A.S. Oka
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court