A petitioners withdrew their writ petition concerning compensation under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with liberty to file afresh, which the court accepted.
Writ Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903.wp.5879.14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Anjali Tushar Aswale
Digitally signed by CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Anjali Tushar Aswale WRIT PETITION NO. 5879 OF 2014 Date: 2018.07.18 14:57:24 +0530 Ramchandra L. Pardole and Others ..Petitioners
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Others ..Respondents
Mr.Utkarsh Desai I/b P. S. Bhavake,for the Petitioners.
CORAM:- K. K. TATED & B. P. COLABAWALLA,JJ. DATE :- JULY 13, 2018.
P. C.:
Heard. The learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that
he has received instructions from his client to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty to file afresh for same cause of action in case the Respondent-State failed and neglected to pay the compensation as per award under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. To that effect he has given in writing. Same is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. Same is accepted.
2 Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
( B. P. COLABAWALLA, J. ) ( K. K. TATED, J. )
Aswale 1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the withdrawal of a writ petition under the Land Acquisition Act is accepted with liberty to refile.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anjali Tushar Aswale
Ramchandra L. Pardole and Others
The State of Maharashtra
Others
K. K. Tated
B. P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
