This order notes that the Writ Petition's subject spot is in Ahmednagar District, requiring presentation to the Aurangabad Bench. The petition was returned to the Advocate accordingly.
Petition returned for presentation before the Bench at Aurangabad.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
4-cwp-5842-18.doc
DSS
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5842 OF 2018 Santosh B. Yevale
Vs.
State of Maharashtra
Office Notes, Office Memorandam of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s orders
Mr. Sachin R. Pawar for the Petitioner Mr. Y.S. Khochare, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1/STate.
CORAM : A.S. OKA AND M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : 25TH SEPTEMBER 2018.
P.C. :
The spot in respect of which the relief is sought in this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India is situated in Taluka – Parnar, District- Ahmednagar. Therefore, this Petition ought to have been filed before the Bench at Aurangabad. We, accordingly, return the Petition to the Advocate for the petitioner for its presentation before the Bench at Aurangabad.
(M. S. SONAK, J.)
(A. S. OKA, J.)
Digitally signed Dinesh by DineshSadanand Sadanand Sherla Sherla Date:2018.09.26 11:21:24 +0530
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed under Article 226 ought to be presented to the Bench at Aurangabad given the spot location.
Whether the present Bench has territorial jurisdiction to entertain the petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh B. Yevale
State of Maharashtra
A.S. Oka
M. S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
