The High Court disposed of the writ petition concerning the admission of an agreement in a suit, observing that the trial court had already reserved the matter for judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP 5441.2017.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5441 OF 2017
MAGAN SHENPADU PAWAR
VERSUS
VITTHAL DAYARAM MALI AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Dhongade Anilkumar B. Advocate for Respondents : Mr Barahate Yuwaraj R. For R/2 To 5,7,8, Mr Desale Nilesh N. For R/1
R/6 Deleted
CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J. Dated: January 17, 2018
PER COURT :-
has overruled the said objection and rejected the application exh.94. Hence, this writ petition.
aaa/-
WP 5441.2017.odt
the suit and reserved the matter on 19.1.2018 for
pronouncement of the judgment.
...
aaa/-
Magan Shenpadu Pawar
Vitthal Dayaram Mali and Others
V.K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
