Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue an alternate remedy. The court allowed the withdrawal with liberty as prayed and kept all respondent objections open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP. 56-16.doc
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION No. 56 OF 2016
Sushil K. Vengurlekar … Petitioner Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors. … Respondents
Mr. R. V. Pai a/w Ruturaj V. Bankar i/b Waqvar Ahmad, for the Petitioner.
Ms. Rajesh Patil a/w Vandana Mahadik, for the Respondent - BMC.
CORAM : A. S. OKA, & P. N. DESHMUKH, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 8, 2018
PC :
placed on record a circular dated 20th March, 2017, which is taken on
record and marked “X” for identification.
seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to adopt an
1 / 2
WP. 56-16.doc
alternate remedy. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of as
withdrawn with liberty as prayed. However, all objections of the Respondents are kept open.
Sd/Sd/[P. N. DESHMUKH, J.] [A. S. OKA, J.]
Vinayak Halemath
2 / 2
Sushil K. Vengurlekar
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
A. S. OKA
P. N. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
