The High Court of Bombay disposed of a writ petition filed by an unregistered Adhoc Committee, holding it not entitled to file proceedings. The court declined to prevent aggrieved persons from seeking relief separately.
The petition was dismissed bar of locus standi; aggrieved persons may file appropriate proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
oswp1122
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1122 OF 2016
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s orders Court’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Javed R. Patel for the Petitioner
Mr.Arshad D. Shaikh i/b Mr.Abdul Ansari for the
Respondent No.4.
Ms Kejali Mastakar for respondent-MMC.
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
P.N.DESHMUKH,JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 5, 2018
P.C.
1 This petition under Article 226
of the Constitution of India has been
filed by an Adhoc Committee which is
not registered under the provisions of
any law. Hence, the petitioner is not
a legal entity and therefore, at the
instance of the petitioner, the
present petition cannot be entertained.
Accordingly, the petition is disposed
of.
2However, this order will not
prevent the aggrieved persons from
filing appropriate proceedings for
claiming reliefs in terms of the
2 oswp1122 prayers in this petition. All contentions of the parties are kept open. (P.N.DESHMUKH,J.) (A.S.OKA,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition needs to be entertained as the petitioner is not a registered legal entity.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Adhoc Committee
Respondent No.4
MMC
A.S.Oka
P.N.Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court