In this default order, the High Court at Aurangabad dismissed the writ petition because the petitioner was absent and had failed to appear on the fixed hearing date.
Writ Petition dismissed in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
912 WRIT PETITION NO. 11964 OF 2015
JANARDHAN RAMRAO GAIKE
VERSUS
THE BRANCH MANAGER AND OTHERS
CORAM : V.K. JADHAV, J. Dated: January 17, 2018
PER COURT :-
in default. It appears that, thereafter circulation was not taken by the petitioner, however, even today also none present for the petitioner. Writ Petition is hereby dismissed in default.
( V.K. JADHAV, J. )
...
aaa/-
JANARDHAN RAMRAO GAIKE
THE BRANCH MANAGER AND OTHERS
V.K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
