Disposed

Dr. Mugdha S. Patki and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC3 Apr 2018WP/5248/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay allowed the withdrawal of a writ petition by the petitioner representatives with liberty to make fresh representations to the Joint Director of Higher Education. The court directed the authorities to decide representations within 4 weeks after a hearing.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition withdrawn with liberty to make fresh representations which authorities must decide within 4 weeks after hearing.

Dr. Mugdha S. Patki and Ors. Vs the State of… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶2

WRIT PETITION NO. 5248 OF 2017

¶3

Dr. Mughda S. Patki and Others. ..Petitioners. Versus State of Maharashtra & Others. ..Respondents.

¶4

Ms. Devyani Kulkarni for the Petitioner. Mrs. M. P. Thakur, AGP for the Respondent-State.

¶5

Coram : Ranjit More & Smt. S. S. Jadhav, JJ. Date : April 3, 2018 .

¶6

P. C. :

¶7

On oral motion, learned Counsel for the Petitioners is allowed to amend the cause title of petition so as to implead the Joint Director of Higher Education, Panvel Region, Panvel as party Respondent No.3A in this petition. Leave granted. Necessary amendment be carried out forthwith.

¶8

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the Petitioners to make fresh representations either to Respondent No.3 or Respondent No.3A regarding the grievance made in this petition. Leave with liberty as prayed for is granted. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is disposed of as such.

¶9

It is made clear that this Court has not gone into merits of the matter and all points and contentions of the respective parties are kept open. Respondent No.3 or Respondent No.3A shall decide the said representations of the Petitioners independently, on its own

¶10

1 / 2

¶11

patilsr

¶12

merits and strictly in accordance with law. An endeavour shall be made by the authority concerned to dispose of such representations of the Petitioners as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within the period of 4 weeks from the date of receipt such representations.

¶13

Before arriving at the final decision, the authority concerned shall give an opportunity of hearing to all concerned. While deciding the said representations, the authority concerned shall take into consideration the order passed by this Court bench at Aurangabad in the case of Sudamrao K. Aher & Ors. vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors.¹ and also the order passed by Division Bench of this Court in the case of Shivaji University Teachers' Association vs. The State of Maharashtra² .

¶14

In order to enable Respondent No.3 and Respondent No. 3A to comply with the directions given hereinabove, the Petitioners shall attend the office of Respondent No.3 and Respondent No.3A on 10^th April 2018 at 11.00 a.m. and submit their individual representations and a copy of this order.

¶15

6. Writ petition stands disposed of.

¶16

[Smt. S. S. JADHAV, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]

¶17

1 Writ Petition No. 10283 of 2012 decided on 21^st March 2013 [High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad.]

¶18

2 Writ Petition No. 5271 of 2014 decided on 8^th November 2017.

¶19

2 / 2

¶20

patilsr

Dr. Mugdha S. Patki and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dr. Mugdha S. Patki and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Neha Nalinkumar Yadgirikar Vs State of Maharashtra Thorugh Its Secretary and Ors.

Smt. Mahadevi Kavachale Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Neha Nalinkumar Yadgirikar Vs State of Maharashtra Thorugh Its Secretary and Ors.

Tararani Vidyapith and Anr. Vs the Registrar Shivaji University and Anr.

Tararani Vidyapith and Anr. Vs the Registrar Shivaji University and Anr.

Mr. Dinesh Nathu Patel and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.