This order condones a delay of 39 days in filing a writ petition by consent of parties and disposes of the application accordingly before registering the main petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
909 ii cao 155-10.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 155 OF 2010 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 8480 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7409 OF 2009
Tararani Vidyapeeth, Kolhapur & Anr.
..Petitioner
v/s.
The Registrar, Shivaji University, Kolhapur
..Respondents
Mr. P.S.Bhavake for the Petitioner. Mr. Amit Borkar for the Respondent No.1. Mr. C.G.Gavnekar a/w. G.S.Hiranandani for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI,JJ. DATED : APRIL 27, 2018.
P.C.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
1 of 1
pps
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 39 days in filing the writ petition should be condoned.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tararani Vidyapeeth, Kolhapur
The Registrar, Shivaji University, Kolhapur
Ranjit More
Anuja PrabhuDESSai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
