Allowed

Mineira Nacional Limitada and Anr., v. Rajan Ragunath Rao Dessai and 2 Ors.

Bombay HC18 Jun 2018WP/517/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the High Court by consent disposed of the matter setting aside the impugned order and directing the Executing Court to recompute the payable amount by treating ROM as DMT for specified periods based on available sample analysis.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order set aside; Executing Court directed to recompute amount payable as DMT for specified periods based on sample reports; amount remitted to Executing Court.

Mineira Nacional Limitada and Anr., Vs Rajan… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 517 OF 2006

¶4

Mineira Nacional Limitada with its Office at Salgaoncar

¶5

Chambers, P.O. Box No.114, Margao-Goa.

¶6

Shri Anil Vassudev Salgaoncar, Managing Director of the Petitioner No.1, major, mine owner, having office at Salgaoncar Chambers, Margao-Goa (Registered Addresses) …. Petitioners

¶7

V e r s u s

¶8

Shri Rajan Ragunath Rao Dessai, Major, married, residing at Flat No.1, Ground Floor, Building No.3, Damodar Housing Society, Aquem-Alto, Margao-Goa.

¶9

Smt. Sangita Rane Sardessai.

¶10

Shri Udaysingh Rane Sardessai, Both residing near Power House, (Electricity Department) Aquem Alto, Margao-Goa-403 601. (Registered addresses) …. Respondents

¶11

Mr. A.D. Bhobe, Advocate with Adv. Ms. Carmita D'Costa and Adv. S. Bhobe for the Petitioners.

¶12

Mr. S. Usgaonkar, Advocate for Respondent no.1.

¶13

Mr. Udaysingh Rane Sardessai, POA of Respondent no.2 present.

¶14

¶15

Wp 517 2006

¶16

CORAM: C. V. BHADANG, J. DATE: 19th June, 2018.

¶17

Oral Order:

¶18

Heard Shri Bhobe, the learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶19

The petitioners have filed a pursis (marked “X” for identification) stating as under:

¶20

The petitioners state that the petitioners have maintained the record of Sample Analysis from the competent laboratories indicating the moisture content of ROM ore extracted from the subject Cuddegal mine with effect from December 2006 up to May 2011. Extraction of ore was stopped with effect from 2012.

¶21

As the records of sample analysis from the laboratories for the period from 1 April 1981 up to November 2006 are presently not available with the petitioners, the petitioners will treat ROM WMT (Wet Metric Ton) as shown in the statement of extraction at page 98 of the paper book of this petition as Dry Metric Ton (DMT) only for the above said period i.e. April 1981 up to November 2006, for the purpose of calculation of the amount of Rs.1/- in terms of the decree, passed in Special Civil Suit No.27/69.

¶22

For the period commencing from the December 2006 till the year 2012, the amount of Rs.1 shall be considered on Dry Metric Ton (DMT) on the basis of the sample

¶23

¶24

Wp 517 2006

¶25

analysis report as obtained and maintained by the petitioners.

¶26

It is submitted that the petition can be disposed of in the aforesaid

¶27

terms.

¶28

I have heard Shri Usgaonkar, the learned counsel for the respondent no.1. I have also heard the respondent no.3, who appears in person. He claims to be the Power of Attorney holder of the respondent no.2 , who is his wife.

¶29

Shri Usgaonkar the learned counsel for the respondent no.1 as also the respondent no.3, who appears in person have no objection for disposal of the petition in terms as suggested in the pursis marked Exhibit "X". In such circumstances and by consent of parties the petition is disposed of in the following terms:

¶30

(i) The impugned order is hereby set aside.

¶31

(ii) The Executing Court shall recompute the amount payable for the period from April 1981 to November 2006 as per decree passed in Special Civil Suit No.27/1969 by treating the ROM as shown in the statement of Extraction at

¶32

page 98 as ROM (DMT).

¶33

(iii) In so far as the period from December 2006 to 2012 is concerned the

¶34

¶35

Wp 517 2006

¶36

Executing Court shall recompute the amount on the basis of (DMT) by taking into consideration the sample analysis report produced by the petitioner along

¶37

with the memo dated 5/8/2016.

¶38

(iv) The amount lying before this Court shall be transferred to the Executing

¶39

Court along with interest, if any, which shall be subject to the further orders as may be passed by the Executing Court.

¶40

(v) The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms with no order as to costs.

¶41

C. V. BHADANG, J.

¶42

Ap/-

Mineira Nacional Limitada and Anr., v. Rajan Ragunath Rao Dessai and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mineira Nacional Limitada and Anr., v. Rajan Ragunath Rao Dessai and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu Kessu Gaude and 7 Ors., Vs Murari Taru Gaude and 3 Ors.

Poto Mahadev Gaonkar (Dec) Rep. Thr. Lrs. and 10 Ors., Vs Savitri Poto Gaonkar (Dec) Thr. Lrs and 7 Ors.

Manikabai Anant Kamat (Expired) through Const. Attorney, by Resp. No. 2 and 8 Ors., Vs Nalini Vyanktesh Sabnis and 3 Ors.

Sheelavati @ Lilavati Raghuvir Dabholkar and 5 Ors., Vs Shrikrishna Pundalik Rivankar (Dec) Thr. His Lrs. and Anr.

Anita L. D'Silva and 3 Ors., Vs Herculano Ernesto Lacerda (Deceased) and 6 Ors.

Ankush Rajaram Naik (Dec), Thr. Lrs., Rep by His Daughter, Sayli Subhash Parab., Vs Ana Maria Josefa Aguiar D'Souza and 15 Ors.