Miscivil application disposed of by direction to show it as disposed after notices were already issued and grant of time served for unserved respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 355 OF 2018 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 120 OF 2017
ANKUSH RAJARAM NAIK (DEC), THR. LRS., REP BY HIS DAUGHTER, SAYLI SUBHASH PARAB.,
... Applicant
Versus
ANA MARIA JOSEFA AGUIAR D'SOUZA AND 15 ORS.,
... Respondents
Adv. P. Phadte holding for Adv. Sandesh D. Padiyar, for the applicant. Adv. R. G. Ramani R-1 Poa Of Respondent no.2 To 10
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:18th June 2018
P.C.:
By order dated 26/4/2018 already notices are directed to be issued as prayed. The civil application to be shown as disposed of.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
ap/-
ANKUSH RAJARAM NAIK (DEC), THR. LRS., REP BY HIS DAUGHTER, SAYLI SUBHASH PARAB.
ANA MARIA JOSEFA AGUIAR D'SOUZA AND 15 ORS.
C.V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
