Petitioners withdrew a writ petition seeking permission to withdraw as they had already removed the subject structure. The Court disposed of the petition accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-4903.13.odt
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4903 OF 2013
Balasaheb Dashrath Solankar and Anr. … Petitioners Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. D.V. Sutar for the Petitioners. Mrs. R.A. Salunkhe, AGP for the Respondent No.1. Mr. Rhishikesh M. Pethe for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3.
CORAM : A.S. OKA &
RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 16th JULY 2018
P.C.
1 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners on instructions states that the petitioners have already removed the subject structure. Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw the petition. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J) (A.S. OKA, J)
Digitally signed by Pallavi Pallavi Mahendra Mahendra Wargaonkar Wargaonkar Date: 2018.07.19 15:50:03 +0530
1 of 1
Balasaheb Dashrath Solankar and Anr.
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
A.S. Oka
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
