High Court dismissed three Writ Petitions as infructuous due to the efflux of time. The petitions were merged for disposal and adjourned by the bench.
Petitions declared infructuous and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4720 OF 2012
Mr.Pawar Nitin Madhukar .. Petitioner Vs. Dadasaheb Swaroopsinh Naik and ors. .. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4721 OF 2012
Mr.Umesh Kashinath Patil .. Petitioner Vs. Dadasaheb Swaroopsinh Naik and ors. .. Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4722 OF 2012
Miss.Waghmare Ashvini Ashok .. Petitioner Vs. K.C.Ajmera Ayurved Mahavidyalaya Dhule and ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Anilkumar Patil, for the Petitioner in all three Writ Petitions. Mr.V.M. Mali AGP for State in WP/4720/12 & 4721/12. Mr.S.B. Kalel, AGP for State in WP/4722/12.
Mrs.S.V.Bharucha a/w Mr.Parag Vyas, for Respondent No.5 in all three Writ Petitions.
CORAM : B.R.GAVAI &
M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 05th SEPTEMBER, 2018
1/2
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the petitioners states that by
efflux of time, Petitions are rendered infructuous. Writ Petitions are disposed of as such.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.) (B.R.GAVAI, J.)
2/2
Urmila Ingale and ors.
Dadasaheb Swaroopsinh Naik and ors.
Mr. Anilkumar Patil
Miss. Waghmare Ashvini Ashok
K.C.Ajmera Ayurved Mahavidyalaya Dhule and ors.
B.R.GAVAI
M.S.KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
