Writ petition rendered infructuous due to subsequent developments and disposed of with no substantive decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Urmila Ingale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4717 OF 2014
Kolhapur Zilla Madhyamik Va Uccha Madhyamik Shala Mukhyadhyapak Sangh, Kolhapur .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra and ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Utkarsh Desai h/f Mr.Prashant Desai, for the Petitioner. Ms.Kavita Solunke, AGP for Respondents No. 1 to 4 - State.
CORAM : B.R.GAVAI &
M.S.KARNIK, JJ. DATE : 05th SEPTEMBER, 2018
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that in view
of subsequent development, the Petition is rendered infructuous.
Writ Petition is disposed of as such.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.) (B.R.GAVAI, J.)
1/1
Kolhapur Zilla Madhyamik Va Uccha Madhyamik Shala Mukhyadhyapak Sangh
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
