The petition was allowed upon leave being granted to withdraw. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive issue on the writ claim was determined.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted; the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
prod-501-wp-4653-2007.doc
oIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4653 OF 2007
Tata Steel Ltd. (Wire Division)
...Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Others
...Respondents
Ms. Ajay Talhar, for the Petitioner.
CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & N. W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE : JULY 09, 2018
P.C.:
. The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to
withdraw the Petition. The prayer is accepted.
(N.W. SAMBRE, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
Vishal Digitally signed by Vishal Subhash Subhash Parekar Date: 2018.07.09 Parekar 17:18:27 +0530
1/1
Vishal Parekar
Tata Steel Ltd. (Wire Division)
The State of Maharashtra
Shantanu Kemkar
N. W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
