Disposed

Miss Sheetal James and Anr. v. Mrt (the Hon'Ble President)

Bombay HC5 Oct 2018WP/4481/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition challenged the pendency of a pending Revision Application before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal. The court dismissed maintaining the writ and remitted the matter for expeditious hearing via a specific application before the Tribunal.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioners to make an application to the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal seeking a prayer for fixing an early date of hearing of the pending Revision Application.

Miss Sheetal James and Anr. Vs Mrt (the Hon'Ble President) — Landlord and Tenant | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

Shridhar Sutar 1 503-wp-4481-18.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 4481 OF 2018

¶4

Sheetal James and another … Petitioners Versus MRT (The Hon'ble President), Fort Mumbai … Respondent …..

¶5

Miss Sheetal James – Petitioners in person.

¶6

CORAM : A. S. OKA AND M. S. SONAK, JJ. DATE : 05^th OCTOBER, 2018.

¶7

P. C.:

¶8

Not on board. Taken on board.

¶9

Heard the petitioners appearing in person. All that we can make out from this petition is that it is a grievance of the petitioners that a Revision Application bearing No. 26 of 2015 filed under Section 76 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, is pending before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal and it is not being heard. There are other allegations made regarding encroachment, danger to the life of the petitioners as well as danger to the life of the petitioners' animals. All these grievances will have to be addressed in proper proceedings and not in this Civil Writ Petition.

¶10

1 of 2

¶11

Shridhar Sutar 2 503-wp-4481-18.doc

¶12

If the petitioners want expeditious hearing of the pending Revision Application by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, the petitioners will have to take out an application before the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal pointing out reasons for giving out of turn priority to the Revision Application.

¶13

Accordingly, we dispose of this petition by granting liberty to the petitioners to make an application to the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal seeking a prayer for fixing an early date of hearing of the pending Revision Application. We are sure that if such application is made, the Tribunal will consider the same sympathetically and will pass appropriate order thereon as expeditiously as possible.

¶14

Subject to the above direction and subject to what is observed above, the writ petition is disposed. of.

¶15

( M. S. SONAK, J. ) ( A. S. OKA, J. )

¶16

Shridhar Digitally signed byShridhar Marutirao Marutirao Sutar Date: 2018.10.08 Sutar 14:39:37 +0530

¶17

2 of 2

Miss Sheetal James and Anr. v. Mrt (the Hon'Ble President)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Miss Sheetal James and Anr. v. Mrt (the Hon'Ble President)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Union of India and Anr. Vs a.N.Bhutani

Union of India, through G.M.Central Railway Vs Mrs.Uma Shanka Mahajan and Ors.

Sakhubai Widow of Late Dinkar Maruti Sonawane Vs Union of India and Ors.

Mr. Balu Shankar Salve Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Revenue and Forest Dept. and Ors.

Shri. Arvind R. Vetkar Vs Union of India, Thru the Secretary, Ministry of Defence , Delhi and Ors.

Shri. Madhav Vishwanath Pendse Vs State of Maharashtra through Dept. of Forest and Anr.