In Writ Petition No. 1627 of 2002, neither advocate nor party appeared for the petitioner at the final hearing. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution and discharged the rule with no order as to costs.
Rule is discharged with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
oswp1627.doc
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1627 OF 2002
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s ordersCourt’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
None for the Petitioner
Mr.Rahul Walia for the Respondent.
Digitally signed byShubhashri Shubhashri Shridhar Shridhar Pathak Pathak Date:2018.10.08 10:55:51 +0530
CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
M.S.SONAK,JJ
DATE : OCTOBER 4, 2018
P.C.
1 Called out for final hearing. None
appears for the petitioner. Writ
petitionisdismissedfornon
prosecution. Rule is discharged with no
order as to costs.
Petitioner
Respondent
A.S. Oka
M.S. Sonak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court