Disposal of a writ petition challenging the maintainability of proceedings under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the CPC. The High Court refused to entertain the petition, leaving all contents open without costs.
None. All contents of respective parties are kept open. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) WP No.3112/2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 3112 OF 2018
Gramsevak, Gram Panchayat, Ahmednagar and another.
Petitioners.
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others.
Respondents.
Mr. A.N. Nagargoje, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. K.N. Lokhande, A.G.P. for the State.
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & SUNIL K. KOTWAL,JJ.
Dated : 2nd August , 2018.
FINAL ORDER :-
. Mr. Nagargoje, learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the proceedings under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure ("C.P.C.") are initiated by respondent No.3, the same are not maintainable.
(2) WP No.3112/2018
XXXIX Rule 2A of the C.P.C. Even the structure was removed prior to passing of the order of injunction. The record to that effect is there.
( SUNIL K. KOTWAL) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA) JUDGE JUDGE
vdd/
Gramsevak, Gram Panchayat, Ahmednagar and another
State of Maharashtra and others
S.V. Gangapurwala
Sunil K. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
