The High Court granted liberty for the petitioner to approach the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad Beed, with a representation. The writ petition was disposed of without deciding the merits.
Liberty granted to petitioner to approach respondent No.2 with representation within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) wp311.18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 311 OF 2018
Nitin s/o. Ramrao Nagargoje
..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
..Respondents
Mr.N.T. Tribhuwan, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.C.S. Kulkarni, AGP for respondent/State.
CORAM : S.S.SHINDE & S.M.GAVHANE,JJ. DATED : 09.01.2018
P.C. :-
1.We grant liberty to the petitioner to approach
respondent No.2 i.e. Chief Executive Officer, Zilla
Parishad, Beed, for redressal of his grievance raised in
this petition by way of filing appropriate representation
/application. In case such representation is filed by
the petitioner within two weeks from today, the Chief
Executive Officer to take decision on said representation
as expeditiously as possible, however, within two weeks
from filing such representation.
2.With the above observations, the writ petition
is disposed of. We make it clear that we have not
entered upon contentions raised on merits in the present
writ petition.
( 2 ) wp311.18
3.The parties to act upon authenticated copy of
this order.
[S.M.GAVHANE,J.][S.S.SHINDE,J.]
snk/2018/SEP18/ wp311.18
Nitin s/o. Ramrao Nagargoje
The State of Maharashtra
S.S.SHINDE
S.M.GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court