The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition where the petitioner challenged the modality of an inquiry. The court held that since the inquiry had not yet started, there was no ground to stall the process, and the petition was dismissed under Article 226.
Writ petition stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp367218.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3672 OF 2018
Yuvraj s/o Gokul Dhere
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.A.R.Devkate, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.C.S.Kulkarni, A.G.P. for respondent no.1.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 11th APRIL, 2018
PER COURT:
The petitioner is objecting to the modality in respect of conduct of inquiry.
The challenge raised is at the initial stage and inquiry is yet to be conducted and report is also expected to be submitted after verification of record. The petitioner does not have any entitlement at this stage to stall the process of inquiry. If, at all, the final outcome goes against the petitioner, it would be open to the petitioner to challenge the adverse order, if any, at an appropriate stage in adherence to the provisions of law.
In exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, we refrain to cause interference in the matter. There is no substance in the petition.
Writ Petition stands dismissed.
K. K. SONAWANE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
adb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere at an initial stage before the inquiry report is submitted.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Yuvraj s/o Gokul Dhere
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
