Court issued directions to Respondent No. 3 to decide on the grant of appointment approval for the petitioner within four months and disposed of the writ petition.
Direction to take decision on approval of appointment within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp196818.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1968 OF 2018
Nuneshwar s/o Pandurang Mande
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.S.K.Kadam, advocate for petitioner. Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for respondents no.1 to 3. Mr.R.J.Nirmal, advocate for Respondents no.4 & 5.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 11th APRIL, 2018
PER COURT:
This petition can be disposed of by issuing directions to Respondent No.3 to take decision on the proposal tendered by Respondents No.4 & 5-Institution in respect of grant of approval to the appointment of petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within four months from today; and it is accordingly directed.
Writ Petition stands disposed of.
K. K. SONAWANE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
adb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioner is entitled to expeditious decision on appointment approval.
Nuneshwar s/o Pandurang Mande
The State of Maharashtra
others
R.M. Borde
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
