The petitioner withdrew the writ petition with liberty to seek representation before the Collector. The court granted leave for withdrawal and dismissal, clarifying it did not consider the merits.
Leave granted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file representation before the Collector, Pune.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by Sachin Sachin Ramchandra Ramchandra Patil IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Patil Date: CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 2018.07.06 16:56:13 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 3350 OF 2017
WRIT PETITION NO. 3350 OF 2017
Chandrakant Rangnath Ghule. ..Petitioner. Versus State of Maharashtra & Others. ..Respondents.
Mr. V. B. Tapkir for the Petitioner. Mrs. R. M. Shinde, AGP for the Respondent-State.
Coram : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. Date : July 5, 2018 .
P. C. :
[SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
1 / 1
patilsr
Chandrakant Rangnath Ghule
State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Anuja PrabhuDEssai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
