The Court dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable. The petitioner had previously filed an identical petition which was withdrawn with liberty to seek appropriate relief. Filing the same petition in identical terms was held to be impermissible.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3 wp 3071-17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3071 OF 2017
Mr. Karamshi R. Ravaria & Ors. .. Petitioners
v/s.
The Maharashtra Industrial Corporation & Ors.
..Respondents
Mr. Angad Giri for the Petitioner.
Mr. Prashant Chavan a/w. Ms. Chaitali Kandare i/b. Navdeep Vora & Associates for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4. Mr. A.R.Mishra for the Respondent No.5.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
DATED : JULY 04, 2018.
P.C. :
pointed out that the petitioner had earlier filed writ petition at Original Side being Writ Petition (L) No. 2029 of 2017 for the similar reliefs claimed in the present petition. This Court, by Order
dated 5th September, 2017 had allowed the petitioner to withdraw
the said writ petition with liberty to seek appropriate relief.
1 of 2
salgaonkar
3 wp 3071-17.doc
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
2 of 2
salgaonkar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition filed with identical parties and reliefs after withdrawal of an earlier petition is maintainable
Mr. Karamshi R. Ravaria & Ors.
The Maharashtra Industrial Corporation & Ors.
Ranjit More
Anjuj Prabhudessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
