The applicant filed an application for transfer of matrimonial proceedings from Buldhana to Hingoli due to financial hardship and residence. The respondent did not appear. The court allowed the application.
Miscellaneous Civil Application allowed and disposed of in terms of prayer clause B.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
mca101-16
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.101 OF 2016
Sangita Gajanan Chavan APPLICANT Age - 26 years, Occ - Household R/o CHandak Layout, Buldhana, Taluka and District - Buldhana, At present R/o C/o Prakash Kisanrao Gire Surana Colony, Karwadi Hingoli Taluka and District - Hingoli
VERSUS
Gajanan Shriram Chavan RESPONDENT Age - 33 years, Occ - Private Service R/o Chandak Layout, Buldhana, Taluka and District - Buldhana
Mr. Anil M. Gaikwad, Advocate for the applicant
[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.]
DATE : 13th AUGUST, 2018
ORDER :
{2} mca101-16
that proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act, instituted by applicant at Hingoli are being attended to by the respondent.
[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.]
Dinesh Digitally signed drp/mca101-16 by Dinesh Ramrao Ramrao Pawar Date: 2018.08.14 10:01:14 +0530 Pawar
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the proceedings under Hindu Marriage Act bearing petition number 1 of 2016 instituted by respondent in court of civil judge senior division Buldhana be transferred to court of civil judge seni
Whether the applicant being financially hard pressed and residing in Hingoli is entitled to transfer of proceedings to Hingoli court.
Sangita Gajanan Chavan
Gajanan Shriram Chavan
Sunil P. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
