Revata Manikrao Raut v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
44-wp-975-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
44 WRIT PETITION NO. 975 OF 2018
REVATA MANIKRAO RAUT ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS
Mr. Mahesh V. Ghatge and Mr. Amol B. Chalak,
Advocates for the Petitioner.
Mr. S. B. Yavalkar, AGP for Respondents-State.
Mr. Prashant P. Dama, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATED : 01st AUGUST, 2018.
PER COURT:-
1.Mr. Ghatge, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that the petitioner had
approached the authority and the authority had
assured the petitioner that they would consider the
petitioner for reappointment.
2.In view of that, on instructions, seeks
leave to withdraw the writ petition. Writ Petition
is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
Devendra/August-18
REVATA MANIKRAO RAUT
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
SUNIL K. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court