The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, dismissed Writ Petition No. 3471 of 2014 on the submission that the petitioner had instructions to withdraw the petition due to subsequent events.
The writ petition no. 3471 of 2014 is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3471.14WP
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
_____________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's | orders or directions | and Registrar's orders |
WRIT PETITION NO. 3471 OF 2014
HIDAYATULLAHA PATHAN S/O ABDUL SATTAR
VERSUS
THE DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY CUM PRIN.
DIST. JUDGE AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for the petitioner :Mr.K.H.
Surve holding for Mr.Hemant Surve
Advocate for respondent nos.1 and 2 :
Mr.N.B. Khandare
...
CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & S.M. GAVHANE, JJ. Dated: January 08, 2018
Not on board. On mentioning taken on
board.
2.Learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner submits that, in view of
subsequent events occurred after filing
this Petition, he has instructions to
withdraw this Petition.
3471.14WP
2
3.The Petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(S.M. GAVHANE,J) (S.S. SHINDE,J)
SGA/
HIDAYATULLAHA PATHAN
THE DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY CUM PRIN. DIST. JUDGE
ANOTHER
S.S. SHINDE
S.M. GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court