Dismissal of Writ Petition No. 3071 of 2017 for the petitioner's non-appearance and stated lack of interest in prosecuting the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26 wp 3071.17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3071 OF 2017
Sandhya Rajesh Prasadi …..Petitioner versus Santosh Vishram Mahavalankar and ors. …..Respondents
None for the petitioner.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATE : 4th JUNE, 2018.
P. C. :
The petition was called out in the morning session, since none
appeared on behalf of the petitioner, it was kept back. When the petition was called out again in the afternoon session, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. The petition is, therefore, dismissed in default.
[SMT.ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
Shubhada S Kadam 1/1
Sandhya Rajesh Prasadi
Santosh Vishram Mahavalankar
Ranjit More
Anuja Prabhudesai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
