This bench rejected the filed writ petition as devoid of substance, holding that the direction sought is unnecessary in light of the Supreme Court judgment in Jagpal Singh and subsequent State Government policy decisions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2976-18.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2976 OF 2018
Varsha Krushi Co-op Housing Society
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr. P.R. Katneshwarkar, advocate for petitioner. Mr. C.S. Kulkarni, A.G.P. for respondents.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE &
K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 4th APRIL, 2018
PER COURT:
In view of judgment delivered by the Honourable Supreme Court in the matter of Jagpal Singh & others Vrs.State of Punjab & others reported in 2011 AIR (SC) 1123 as well as subsequent policy decision of the State Government, the direction as requested by petitioner in the instant petition need not be issued. Petition is devoid of substance hence stands rejected.
K. K. SONAWANE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the direction as requested by the petitioner in the instant petition should be issued in view of the Supreme Court judgment and subsequent policy decisions.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jagpal Singh & others Vrs. State of Punjab & othersReferred¶3
Jagpal Singh & others Vrs.State of Punjab & others reported in 2011 AIR (SC) 1123 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Varsha Krushi Co-op Housing Society
The State of Maharashtra
R.M. Borde
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
