The court directed Respondent No.3 to decide on the petitioner's representation expeditiously, preferably within four weeks, on merits and per law. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
Directions were issued to Respondent No.3 to decide the representation within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp339218.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3392 OF 2018
Ramesh s/o Uttamrao Kaldate
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr.P.D.Bachate, advocate for the petitioner. Mr.S.S.Dande, A.G.P. for Respondents.
CORAM : R.M.BORDE AND
K.K.SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 03rd April, 2018.
P.C. :
This petition can be disposed of by issuing directions to Respondent No.3 to take decision on the representation tendered by the petitioner on 10.12.2017, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from today, on its own merits and in accordance with provisions of law.
Petition is accordingly disposed of.
K.K.SONAWANE R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE
adb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be directed to expedite decision on his representation.
Ramesh s/o Uttamrao Kaldate
The State of Maharashtra
R.M.Borde
K.K.Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
