Partly allowed

Mr. P. a. Ananthraman and Anr. v. M/S. Ganesh Paper Mart

Bombay HC16 Mar 2018WP/2843/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hearing a writ petition challenging an order directing deposit of Rs.15.87 lakhs, the High Court reduced the deposit to Rs.10 lakhs as an indulgence, allowing the matter to be decided on merits, provided the reduced amount is deposited within one month.

What did the court decide?

Deposit amount reduced from Rs.15,87,881/- to Rs.10,00,000/-; order allowable subject to deposit within one month.

Mr. P. a. Ananthraman and Anr. Vs M/S. Ganesh… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

910 WP 2843 OF 2018.odt

¶2

vks

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO.2843 OF 2018

¶5

P.A. Ananthraman and
anr	…	Petitioners
V/s.
M/s Ganesh Paper Mart	…	Respondent.

¶6

Ms. Afshan Goghari, for the Petitioners. Mr. S. N. Vaishnav a/w Mr.Rahul Raut i/bny M/s. N.N.Vaiswhnava for the Respondents.

¶7

CORAM : DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.

¶8

DATE : 16^th MARCH, 2018.

¶9

P.C. :

¶10

1] Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and respondent. 2] By this petition, the petitioners are challenging the order dated 18.11.2017, passed by the City Civil Court, Mumbai, thereby disposing off the Summons for Judgment No.216 of 2016, directing the petitioners to deposit the principal amount of Rs.15,87,881/- in the Court, within two months from the date of order, alongwith written statement.

¶11

3] The only submission advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners are unable to raise this amount of Rs.15,87,881/- despite the efforts made by them and therefore, the 1/2

¶12

said amount may be reduced taking a sympathetic view of the matter. Only by way of indulgence, in order that the matter should be decided on merits, this Court is inclined to reduce the amount of Rs.15,87,881/- to Rs.10,00,000/- to be deposited by the petitioners within a month from the date of this order alongwith the written statement as directed by the trial Court.

¶13

4] No further extension shall be granted . 5] On failure to deposit the aforesaid sum within the stipulated period, the order passed by this Court shall stand vacated. 6] Writ Petition is disposed of in above terms.

¶14

[DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.]

¶15

2/2

Mr. P. a. Ananthraman and Anr. v. M/S. Ganesh Paper Mart

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr. P. a. Ananthraman and Anr. v. M/S. Ganesh Paper Mart

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kantaram Bhiva Hargude and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Shri. Rajendra Shashikant Malkar Vs Smt. Rajashri Siidhlinga Swami and Ors.

Bharatiya Kala Prasarini Sabha Ptr No. F/131/PUNE Trhough Its Trustees Vs Shri. Rajeev Baburao Takawale and Ors.

Jaywant Bhaskar Patil Deceased through Legal Heirs and Ors. Vs Rakeshkumar Kuldipsingh Wadhawan through Diwan Builders ,and Ors.

Firoz Shakeel Pathan Vs Bagwan Makka Masjid Trust, and Ors.

Shri. Suresh Tulshiram Bhagwat Vs Shri. Khashaba Dhondiba Thombare and Ors.