Disposed

Bharatiya Kala Prasarini Sabha Ptr No. F/131/PUNE Trhough Its Trustees v. Shri. Rajeev Baburao Takawale and Ors.

Bombay HC15 Mar 2018WP/2405/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the High Court directed the District Judge, Pune, to expeditiously decide a pending stay application or the main civil application under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Judge, Pune, to decide the pending stay application or the main civil application on merits within eight weeks.

Bharatiya Kala Prasarini Sabha Ptr No… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

osk 921-wp-2405-2018.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 2405 OF 2018

¶4

Bharatiya Kala Prasarini Sabha & Ors..	…	Petitioners
V/s.
Rajeev Baburao Takawale & Ors.	…	Respondents

¶5

Mr.Shirish V. Pitre for the Petitioners.

¶6

Mr.Nitin Dalvi for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.

¶7

Mr.A.R. Metkari, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.5 & 6.

¶8

CORAM : DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J. DATE : 15^th MARCH, 2018.

¶9

P.C. :

¶10

1] Heard learned counsel for both the parties.

¶11

2] The alternate prayer which is made in this Writ Petition is

¶12

the direction to the District Judge, Pune to either decide the stay Application, which is pending since August 2017, within a period of four weeks or to decide the Application No.654 of 2017 filed under Section 72 of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950, on merits as expeditiously as possible and in any case, within a period of eight weeks.

¶13

1/2

¶14

osk 921-wp-2405-2018.odt

¶15

3] In my considered opinion, having regard to the grievance raised that the stay application is pending since last more than 07 months, it would be appropriate to dispose of this Writ Petition by directing the learned District Judge, Pune to decide the stay application in Civil Application No.654 of 2017 as expeditiously as possible and within a period of 8 weeks from the receipt of this order or otherwise to decide the main Civil Application No.654 of 2017 itself on merits, as expeditiously as possible.

¶16

4] The Writ Petition is therefore disposed of in above terms.

¶17

5] All concerned parties to act on the basis of the authenticated copy of this order.

¶18

[DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.]

¶19

2/2

Bharatiya Kala Prasarini Sabha Ptr No. F/131/PUNE Trhough Its Trustees v. Shri. Rajeev Baburao Takawale and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bharatiya Kala Prasarini Sabha Ptr No. F/131/PUNE Trhough Its Trustees v. Shri. Rajeev Baburao Takawale and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nanasaheb Dashrath Dhuke Vs Vanita Dattatraya Gaikwad and Ors.

Shri Jayant Bhimsen Joshi and Ors. Vs Shri Raghavendra Bhimsen Joshi and Ors.

Sunil Gunjeshwari Singh Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Kantaram Bhiva Hargude and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Shri. Rajendra Shashikant Malkar Vs Smt. Rajashri Siidhlinga Swami and Ors.

Rajesh Omkarrao Bhagwat Vs Arvindkumar Ramdulare Giri and Anr.