Disposes of two writ petitions filed by a construction company against the Nanded Waghala City Municipal Corporation without deciding substantive merits, leaving remedies open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
928 &977 sr.no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
928 WRIT PETITION NO. 3473 OF 2018
M/S SAI CONSTRUCTION THROUGH ITS PARTNER AJAY SHRIRAMGUTTE VERSUS NANDED WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION NANDED THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER AND ANO
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. R.D. Biradar
Adv. for Respondents: Mr. M.D. Narwadkar h/f Mr. M.V. Deshpande
WITH
977 WRIT PETITION NO. 2838 OF 2018
M/S SAI CONSTRUCTION THROUGH ITS PARTNER AJAY SHRIRAMGUTTE VERSUS
NANDED WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION NANDED THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER AND ANO
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. R.D. Biradar
Adv. for Respondents: Mr. M.D. Narwadkar h/f Mr. M.V. Deshpande
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ. DATE : 5th April, 2018.
PER COURT:-
It would be open for the petitioners to avail of the remedies available in law. Keeping the option of the petitioners to avail of the remedies open, writ petitions stand disposed of.
grt/-
M/S Sai Construction
Nanded Waghala City Municipal Corporation Nanded
R.M. Borde
K.K. Sonawane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
