Rumana Tarrannum Sayyad Mukhatar Ali v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court Bench at Aurangabad adjourned two writ petitions regarding teachers' inability to join duties, along with two other related writs, to February 20, 2018. No substantive decision was made.
What the court decided
1 Sr31 WP2779.2017 & Anr
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
WRIT PETITION NO. 2779 OF 2017
Rumana Tarrannum Sayyad Mukhatar Ali … Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
… Respondents
Mr M. D. Narwadkar, Advocate for the petitioner A. V. Deshmukh, AGP for respondent/State Mr P. D. Suryawanshi, Advocate for respondents no. 3 and 4
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 13818 OF 2017
Farouqui Shahana Begum d/o Mumtaz Farouqui … Petitioner
VERSUS
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rumana Tarrannum Sayyad Mukhatar Ali
- petitioner
Farouqui Shahana Begum
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court