The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of a contempt petition filed in connection with a writ petition regarding validation proceedings. The respondent AGP confirmed the matter would be decided within 15 days.
No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 Sr62 CP24.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY. BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 24 OF 2018 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5081 OF 2016
Gayatri Santosh Sonawane … Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
Mr A. I. Deshmukh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr A. S. Shinde, AGP for respondent/State
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.
DATE : 22ND JANUARY, 2018.
ORDER:
. Learned AGP on instructions states that, the hearing in the matter has already taken place and within 15 days, the validation proceedings would be decided.
[ A. M. DHAVALE ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE
Punde
Gayatri Santosh Sonawane
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
A. M. Dhavale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
