The High Court disposed of the writ petition after being informed that the petitioner had completed his D.Ed. qualification and received permanent approval, rendering the relief claimed obsolete. Rule discharged.
Rule discharged. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp2712.06
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2712 OF 2006
AMBADAS BALIRAM GAIKWAD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS
Mr.S.D.Sugdare h/f. Mr.R.R. Suryawanshi, Advocate for the
petitioner.
Mr.A.V. Deshmukh, AGP for respondent/State.
CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA &
S.M.GAVHANE, JJ.
DATED :07.09.2018
P.C. :-
1.Mr.Sugdare h/f. Mr.R.R. Suryawanshi, learned
Counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequently the
petitioner has completed D.Ed. qualification and
permanent approval has been granted to him. Learned
Counsel submits that now the relief claimed does not
survive. In view of that the writ petition is disposed
of. Rule discharged. No costs.
[S.M.GAVHANE,J.]
[S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.]
snk/2018/SEP18/ wp2712.06
Ambadas Baliram Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra
S.V.GANGAPURWALA
S.M.GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court